Ratings
Performance Rating, speed figures, official ratings, RPR and Top Speed where the feed supplies them.
Back to Tip Lab
Transparent by design
How the model selects—and how we keep it honest.
The model publishes one highest-ranked runner in every race. That is a selection, not a promise, and it does not mean the available price represents value.
The evidence ranking
Each available measure is ranked within that field, weighted, and combined. Missing data reduces confidence rather than being treated as a zero. If runners remain tied, the market acts only as a tie-breaker.
Recent form
Finishing-position evidence and recency, interpreted relative to the other runners in the same race.
Connections and readiness
Trainer form and days since the last run are used as supporting—not dominant—signals.
Market context
Available prices break weak-data ties and anchor any price estimate. A high ranking is never treated as a calibrated probability by itself.
No retrospective edits
A tip is recorded against the race before settlement. Losing selections remain in the record.
One consistent staking rule
Tip Lab reports every result to a £1 win stake at the recorded available price, falling back to SP where necessary.
Fair-odds safeguards
Probability and fair odds are withheld unless coverage, confidence and market data clear strict checks. A ranking alone is not a price.
The record matters more than the headline.
The model is provisional until it has a meaningful chronological sample. Tip Lab exists so members can judge it from the full record rather than selected winners.
View Tip Lab